Table streaming reads and writes
Delta Lake is deeply integrated with Spark Structured Streaming through readStream
and writeStream
. Delta Lake overcomes many of the limitations typically associated with streaming systems and files, including:
Maintaining “exactly-once” processing with more than one stream (or concurrent batch jobs)
Efficiently discovering which files are new when using files as the source for a stream
For many Delta Lake operations on tables, you enable integration with Apache Spark DataSourceV2 and Catalog APIs (since 3.0) by setting configurations when you create a new SparkSession
. See Configure SparkSession.
In this article:
Delta table as a source
When you load a Delta table as a stream source and use it in a streaming query, the query processes all of the data present in the table as well as any new data that arrives after the stream is started.
spark.readStream.format("delta")
.load("/tmp/delta/events")
import io.delta.implicits._
spark.readStream.delta("/tmp/delta/events")
In this section:
Limit input rate
The following options are available to control micro-batches:
maxFilesPerTrigger
: How many new files to be considered in every micro-batch. The default is 1000.maxBytesPerTrigger
: How much data gets processed in each micro-batch. This option sets a “soft max”, meaning that a batch processes approximately this amount of data and may process more than the limit in order to make the streaming query move forward in cases when the smallest input unit is larger than this limit. If you useTrigger.Once
for your streaming, this option is ignored. This is not set by default.
If you use maxBytesPerTrigger
in conjunction with maxFilesPerTrigger
, the micro-batch processes data until either the maxFilesPerTrigger
or maxBytesPerTrigger
limit is reached.
Note
In cases when the source table transactions are cleaned up due to the logRetentionDuration
configuration and the stream lags in processing, Delta Lake processes the data corresponding to the latest available transaction history of the source table but does not fail the stream. This can result in data being dropped.
Ignore updates and deletes
Structured Streaming does not handle input that is not an append and throws an exception if any modifications occur on the table being used as a source. There are two main strategies for dealing with changes that cannot be automatically propagated downstream:
You can delete the output and checkpoint and restart the stream from the beginning.
You can set either of these two options:
ignoreDeletes
: ignore transactions that delete data at partition boundaries.ignoreChanges
: re-process updates if files had to be rewritten in the source table due to a data changing operation such asUPDATE
,MERGE INTO
,DELETE
(within partitions), orOVERWRITE
. Unchanged rows may still be emitted, therefore your downstream consumers should be able to handle duplicates. Deletes are not propagated downstream.ignoreChanges
subsumesignoreDeletes
. Therefore if you useignoreChanges
, your stream will not be disrupted by either deletions or updates to the source table.
Example
For example, suppose you have a table user_events
with date
, user_email
, and action
columns that is partitioned by date
. You stream out of the user_events
table and you need to delete data from it due to GDPR.
When you delete at partition boundaries (that is, the WHERE
is on a partition column), the files are already segmented by value so the delete just drops those files from the metadata. Thus, if you just want to delete data from some partitions, you can use:
spark.readStream.format("delta")
.option("ignoreDeletes", "true")
.load("/tmp/delta/user_events")
However, if you have to delete data based on user_email
, then you will need to use:
spark.readStream.format("delta")
.option("ignoreChanges", "true")
.load("/tmp/delta/user_events")
If you update a user_email
with the UPDATE
statement, the file containing the user_email
in question is rewritten. When you use ignoreChanges
, the new record is propagated downstream with all other unchanged records that were in the same file. Your logic should be able to handle these incoming duplicate records.
Specify initial position
You can use the following options to specify the starting point of the Delta Lake streaming source without processing the entire table.
startingVersion
: The Delta Lake version to start from. All table changes starting from this version (inclusive) will be read by the streaming source. You can obtain the commit versions from theversion
column of the DESCRIBE HISTORY command output.To return only the latest changes, specify
latest
.
startingTimestamp
: The timestamp to start from. All table changes committed at or after the timestamp (inclusive) will be read by the streaming source. One of:A timestamp string. For example,
"2019-01-01T00:00:00.000Z"
.A date string. For example,
"2019-01-01"
.
You cannot set both options at the same time; you can use only one of them. They take effect only when starting a new streaming query. If a streaming query has started and the progress has been recorded in its checkpoint, these options are ignored.
Important
Although you can start the streaming source from a specified version or timestamp, the schema of the streaming source is always the latest schema of the Delta table. You must ensure there is no incompatible schema change to the Delta table after the specified version or timestamp. Otherwise, the streaming source may return incorrect results when reading the data with an incorrect schema.
Example
For example, suppose you have a table user_events
. If you want to read changes since version 5, use:
spark.readStream.format("delta")
.option("startingVersion", "5")
.load("/tmp/delta/user_events")
If you want to read changes since 2018-10-18, use:
spark.readStream.format("delta")
.option("startingTimestamp", "2018-10-18")
.load("/tmp/delta/user_events")
Process initial snapshot without data being dropped
When using a Delta table as a stream source, the query first processes all of the data present in the table. The Delta table at this version is called the initial snapshot. By default, the Delta table’s data files are processed based on which file was last modified. However, the last modification time does not necessarily represent the record event time order.
In a stateful streaming query with a defined watermark, processing files by modification time can result in records being processed in the wrong order. This could lead to records dropping as late events by the watermark.
You can avoid the data drop issue by enabling the following option:
withEventTimeOrder: Whether the initial snapshot should be processed with event time order.
With event time order enabled, the event time range of initial snapshot data is divided into time buckets. Each micro batch processes a bucket by filtering data within the time range. The maxFilesPerTrigger and maxBytesPerTrigger configuration options are still applicable to control the microbatch size but only in an approximate way due to the nature of the processing.
The graphic below shows this process:
Notable information about this feature:
The data drop issue only happens when the initial Delta snapshot of a stateful streaming query is processed in the default order.
You cannot change
withEventTimeOrder
once the stream query is started while the initial snapshot is still being processed. To restart withwithEventTimeOrder
changed, you need to delete the checkpoint.If you are running a stream query with withEventTimeOrder enabled, you cannot downgrade it to a DBR version which doesn’t support this feature until the initial snapshot processing is completed. If you need to downgrade, you can wait for the initial snapshot to finish, or delete the checkpoint and restart the query.
This feature is not supported in the following uncommon scenarios:
The event time column is a generated column and there are non-projection transformations between the Delta source and watermark.
There is a watermark that has more than one Delta source in the stream query.
With event time order enabled, the performance of the Delta initial snapshot processing might be slower.
Each micro batch scans the initial snapshot to filter data within the corresponding event time range. For faster filter action, it is advised to use a Delta source column as the event time so that data skipping can be applied (check _ for when it’s applicable). Additionally, table partitioning along the event time column can further speed the processing. You can check Spark UI to see how many delta files are scanned for a specific micro batch.
Example
Suppose you have a table user_events
with an event_time
column. Your streaming query is an aggregation query. If you want to ensure no data drop during the initial snapshot processing, you can use:
spark.readStream.format("delta")
.option("withEventTimeOrder", "true")
.load("/tmp/delta/user_events")
.withWatermark("event_time", "10 seconds")
..note: You can also enable this with Spark config on the cluster which will apply to all streaming queries: spark.databricks.delta.withEventTimeOrder.enabled true
Delta table as a sink
You can also write data into a Delta table using Structured Streaming. The transaction log enables Delta Lake to guarantee exactly-once processing, even when there are other streams or batch queries running concurrently against the table.
Note
The Delta Lake VACUUM
function removes all files not managed by Delta Lake but skips any directories that begin with _
. You can safely store checkpoints alongside other data and metadata for a Delta table using a directory structure such as <table_name>/_checkpoints
.
In this section:
Append mode
By default, streams run in append mode, which adds new records to the table.
You can use the path method:
events.writeStream
.format("delta")
.outputMode("append")
.option("checkpointLocation", "/tmp/delta/_checkpoints/")
.start("/delta/events")
events.writeStream
.format("delta")
.outputMode("append")
.option("checkpointLocation", "/tmp/delta/events/_checkpoints/")
.start("/tmp/delta/events")
import io.delta.implicits._
events.writeStream
.outputMode("append")
.option("checkpointLocation", "/tmp/delta/events/_checkpoints/")
.delta("/tmp/delta/events")
or the toTable
method in Spark 3.1 and higher (the Delta Lake library 8.3 and above), as follows. (In Spark versions before 3.1 (the Delta Lake library 8.2 and below), use the table
method instead.)
events.writeStream
.format("delta")
.outputMode("append")
.option("checkpointLocation", "/tmp/delta/events/_checkpoints/")
.toTable("events")
events.writeStream
.outputMode("append")
.option("checkpointLocation", "/tmp/delta/events/_checkpoints/")
.toTable("events")
Complete mode
You can also use Structured Streaming to replace the entire table with every batch. One example use case is to compute a summary using aggregation:
(spark.readStream
.format("delta")
.load("/tmp/delta/events")
.groupBy("customerId")
.count()
.writeStream
.format("delta")
.outputMode("complete")
.option("checkpointLocation", "/tmp/delta/eventsByCustomer/_checkpoints/")
.start("/tmp/delta/eventsByCustomer")
)
spark.readStream
.format("delta")
.load("/tmp/delta/events")
.groupBy("customerId")
.count()
.writeStream
.format("delta")
.outputMode("complete")
.option("checkpointLocation", "/tmp/delta/eventsByCustomer/_checkpoints/")
.start("/tmp/delta/eventsByCustomer")
The preceding example continuously updates a table that contains the aggregate number of events by customer.
For applications with more lenient latency requirements, you can save computing resources with one-time triggers. Use these to update summary aggregation tables on a given schedule, processing only new data that has arrived since the last update.
Idempotent table writes in foreachBatch
Note
Available in Delta Lake 2.0.0 and above.
The command foreachBatch allows you to specify a function that is executed on the output of every micro-batch after arbitrary transformations in the streaming query. This allows implementating a foreachBatch
function that can write the micro-batch output to one or more target Delta table destinations. However, foreachBatch
does not make those writes idempotent as those write attempts lack the information of whether the batch is being re-executed or not. For example, rerunning a failed batch could result in duplicate data writes.
To address this, Delta tables support the following DataFrameWriter
options to make the writes idempotent:
txnAppId
: A unique string that you can pass on eachDataFrame
write. For example, you can use the StreamingQuery ID astxnAppId
.txnVersion
: A monotonically increasing number that acts as transaction version.
Delta table uses the combination of txnAppId
and txnVersion
to identify duplicate writes and ignore them.
If a batch write is interrupted with a failure, rerunning the batch uses the same application and batch ID, which would help the runtime correctly identify duplicate writes and ignore them. Application ID (txnAppId
) can be any user-generated unique string and does not have to be related to the stream ID.
Warning
If you delete the streaming checkpoint and restart the query with a new checkpoint, you must provide a different appId
; otherwise, writes from the restarted query will be ignored because it will contain the same txnAppId
and the batch ID would start from 0.
The same DataFrameWriter
options can be used to achieve the idempotent writes in non-Streaming job. For details Idempotent writes.
Example
app_id = ... # A unique string that is used as an application ID.
def writeToDeltaLakeTableIdempotent(batch_df, batch_id):
batch_df.write.format(...).option("txnVersion", batch_id).option("txnAppId", app_id).save(...) # location 1
batch_df.write.format(...).option("txnVersion", batch_id).option("txnAppId", app_id).save(...) # location 2
val appId = ... // A unique string that is used as an application ID.
streamingDF.writeStream.foreachBatch { (batchDF: DataFrame, batchId: Long) =>
batchDF.write.format(...).option("txnVersion", batchId).option("txnAppId", appId).save(...) // location 1
batchDF.write.format(...).option("txnVersion", batchId).option("txnAppId", appId).save(...) // location 2
}